An increasing number of people, even including college students, are choosing to live together before marriage, so called “cohabitation”, thought the conservative oppose it; the radical young men hail it; the rest remain the ambiguous attitudes. A new round of debating about “cohabite or not ”are going on: some stick to the numerous benefits of cohabitation in love, finance, harmonious family life and so on, on the contrary, others believe that cohabitation is not so beneficial as it sounds on the surface. At least, the disadvantages overweight the possible advantages. After going through profound research, we find that the latter is more convincing. These are a number of reasons given today for living together, most of which are based on current popular myths. Several of the most common myths are as follows.
“Living together before marriage increases your chances of having a happy marriage together.” This may be the predominant reason persuading couples of young girls and boys to move to live together. In a study at the University of Western Ontario, sociologists investigated the relationship between cohabitation and divorce among Canadian couples. Through analysis of a national representative sample of over 8,000 ever married men and women, the sociologists established that “premarital cohabiters in Canada have over twice the risk of divorce…when compared with no cohabiters.” It is not a coincidence, and such results are also found in other studies. Perhaps people living in such a union “cohabitation” are lack of the restriction of legislation of formal marriage. Such a trial marriage means they can easily end up the relationship, and they hardly take the relationship seriously, take little notice of the small things, which may not affect the present life, but it’s vital to the latter happy marriage. Most of people who have already cohabitated regard marriage as cohabitation with a piece of paper” so they would end it without too much concerns, which is different from people who haven’t have such premarital cohabitation. Thus, trial marriage is not the guarantee of happy marriage. No doubt that relationship dispends on but the unsteady, unreliable, abstract motion or feeling is hard to sustain.
Another myth is that “Everybody is doing it, nobody cares.” Admittedly, more and more people accepted premarital cohabitation, some even actually do it, however, in china, and the predominant moral standards still go against this kind of action. In traditional Chinese ideas, girl’s chastity is the best gift for the bridegroom. Having sex or not is considered to judge a good girl, wife, even daughter in law. It’s understandable that people have such thoughts. Take buying shoes for instance, most people would like to wear it to see if the shoes are fit. However, they usually refer new shoes to the sample shoes, which maybe a lot of people have already tried it. It’s out of the instinct, not something else. Even if the husband doesn’t care about it, the moral pressure coming form people around, especially family members, can be the impediments on the road to a successful marriage even on the process of getting along with the kin. However open China is, virginity is still a rather important thing in a country with a long history of feudal culture.
“Cohabitation is as same as the marriage without a certificate” seemingly a piece of paper is the only distinction between them. It is true that they live together, share the expense together, make love, and maybe bring up children. However, apart from that, there remains lots of differences. Most men cohabit because of the need of sex and the convenience of relationship. Whereas, women cohabit with expectation that it will lead to marriage. Moreover, women usually spend more time in, devote more to the family as a real wife, the hostess. Now modern women, also have a job outside as man, have to bear duel duties, which definitely exhausts the women. Nevertheless, they also have to take the risk of being pregnant and have to abort if the men don’t want this baby. Absolutely abortion blows both physical and mental hits to the girls. Furthermore, once men break up with them, they can not receive the legislative aid. What’s more, Dietitians have found that women tend to gain weight once they move in with male partners. “Living with a male seemed to put pressure on females to consume more of the ‘unhealthy’ choices while females had a positive influence on the diets of the males”, according to the research at the Newcastle University Human Nutrition Research Center in Britain. Because women tend to take control of the diet and also voluntarily take up the task of consuming the leftovers, which are undoubtedly damaged the women’s health. In such a relation, females suffer more than males.
“Cohabitation provides the economic benefits.” In terms of money, it’s cheaper to live together because another one shares the house rent, and living materials with you. You acctually hold more money in you hands. At the same time, what are you losing? Moral standards, virginity, purity, self-esteem, as well as good impression in others’ mind. Can they be measured by money? Or do they just worth such a mount of money? Everyone has a rule in their minds.
In short, living together before marriage is not a good choice. Short-term love or relation cannot accumulate to a happy marriage without the vow in public, the firm loyalty as well as the faith to live through the whole life and bring up their children. Thus, girls and boys need to think for a while before moving to live together. Ask ourselves whether we are equipped with enough responsibility, confidence, determination and mental preparation for the difficulties in future. If not, we’d better abandon the idea.
Work Cited List
L. Harris Catherine, Ph.D “Cohabitation before Marriage: Is It a Risk Factor for Divorce?” 3 Nov.2000.
Risen Clay “cohabitation is bad for women’s health” New York Times 10 Dec.2006
“Allow college students to cohabit” 9,April, 2007
“Cohabitation Pro or Con”
“Money and jobs play major role in predicting who cohabits and who marries” Cornell University, 1999, www.newswise.com