Who is Going to Compromise
March 29th, 2008Performance enhancing drugs have never failed to trigger people’s discussion and fascinate athletes for both amateur and professional alike.
Recently, the players association and the commissioner’s office continued efforts Thursday to reach an agreement on the Mitchell report’s recommendations on performance-enhancing drugs. Mitchell had issued his report on December 13th last year on the use of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball. Among his recommendation in the report was a call for an independent drug testing program. The players association said that they were will to adopt the increasing drug test all around the year, but there was no need to establish an independent program. Fewer and fewer athletes have been mired in the punitive drug testing since it was instituted at the start of 2004 season. One of the lawyer contented that both sides felt they were compelled to adopt the recommendations so as not to anger the Congress. While the Congress imposed more pressure on them unless they had tackled drug test more aggressively. But right, neither the players association nor the commissioner’ office has supported changing the testing program into an independent testing administrator. This reminded me of the paper we learnt about the unsuccessfulness of tackling anti-doping. If we turn over the right of government in drug-testing to an independent agency, they may have much more freedom to preceed their experiments. The program under the control of bureau would attach more concerns on athletes’ health rather than the thorough settlement of the problem.
As of the recent time, no compromise has been reached on this issue except for some of Mitchell’s recommendations.
