The Case (again) for Teacher Training
Teaching English is a craft that we all have to learn. We all know that you are not automatically a good English teacher just because you are a native speaker. Having a Bachelor’s or a Master’s degree won’t make you one either except if one of these involved substantial, observed teaching practice, in which case you’d be off to a great start. Likewise those with a PGCE or equivalent teacher training.
There are also teachers who although unqualified, have made it their business to read, experiment, learn from colleagues, peer observe, ask for feedback and develop from an ingrained sense of personal and professional pride. These are to be admired.
In any event, what English teachers need, is proper teacher training - hard training in effective classroom techniques and methods. Why does this simple fact not register with so many employers in Korea and especially Korean Universities for whom a Masters (in anything!) is often seen as the badge of competence? Don’t people know that even most TESOL MAs are completely theoretical without any practical teacher training? Also, why do so many foreign teachers in Korea not bother to get trained or train themselves in ESL/EFL teaching methods? The obvious answer is they don’t need it to get a job here and once appointed, there is little real quality control after the fact in all but a few select schools.
Every year, Korea is importing hundreds of foreigners to teach English. Graduates? Yes. Smart? Definitely. Good teachers? Often not. Why?
Most are unqualified and untrained and once they get comfortable and get a few years’ experience behind them, they rather complacently assume that what they are subjecting their students to on a daily basis is effective teaching. In many cases, it is far from! They become like old dogs who won’t learn new tricks and often say “I have X years teaching experience” but in reality it is more like one year plus X years repetition/stagnation.
To enter Korea as an English teacher, you must have a university degree to comply with immigration laws and that is very good. You now have people who are more than just native speakers but those who in addition are likely (although not always!) to be pretty articulate in speech and capable of good academic writing since these two skills will certainly be developed over the course of a 3 or 4 year academic degree. Their own English skills are of a high standard. They will, more often than not, be good communicators too.
You get other good things with graduates too, like the ability to express themselves clearly, mount and find flaws in arguments etc. In short they are smart, proud people and certainly capable of understanding very well what they are taught and what they read. The MA takes it a little further and these skills are further refined. Now you have someone who can deal with complex academic argumentation and who is capable of quality research. Still won’t make you an English teacher though.
This critique doesn’t just apply to all the native speaker “teachers” Korea receives by the plane load every year. It’s the same for Korean English “teachers” too. Even if they can actually speak English fluently (around 50% according to a 2005 study) they still won’t be giving their students much more than boring lectures if they haven’t learned how to teach a second language properly. In this respect foreigners should be very careful when scoffing at the seemingly outdated methods of Korean teachers. The message is: “Physician, heal thyself!”
So where can you get this teacher training from? Well, you won’t get it from an online TESOL certificate that’s for sure! Many other initial TESOL/TEFL certificates aren’t worth the paper they are written on either, simply because success in these amounts to reading and writing assignments - meat and drink to any smart graduate. Sadly, the current fad in TESOL courses for Koreans is focused mostly on reading and writing assignments too.
The best teacher training courses available at the moment are the Cambridge DELTA or the Trinity Diploma. Some universities also offer a postgraduate diploma or MA in TESOL where you must undergo a lengthy and rigorous period of teacher training and observed teaching practice. As mentioned before, some schools are committed to teacher development with regular observations and some have experienced and helpful senior staff. They offer training of high quality as an ongoing and not just pre-service commitment. These are the best ways to get on the road to becoming a good teacher.
Unfortunately in Korea, we have the situation where untrained graduates arrive and end up in front of 30 or 40 unruly kids (in public schools) and don’t know what they are doing. The stress levels must be enormous! If they are smart/lucky, they might choose a kids hagwon where the class sizes will be much smaller and where the owners probably don’t care what they do so long as there are no great complaints. In either of these 2 cases, unless they are really keen to learn and have the luxury of experienced and dedicated colleagues to guide them, they won’t develop.
Then there are the university English instructors - a separate breed who often think their MA and “professor” status should speak for itself. In many cases though, what they are doing is not good teaching.
The problem with many of these guys is that, having been around teaching and teachers for years and concluding that EFL isn’t exactly rocket science, assume that they, by virtue of having written an academic thesis, are of course, qualified to teach English.
We all must realize though, that EFL/ESL teaching is a unique set of skills and methods altogether. In this post, I want to encourage teachers out there to find out what they are and begin practising them. Better still, when finances and opportunity permit - go and get yourself properly trained!




Teacher training, yes. But also teacher education. Prospective teachers of ALL subjects (not just EFL) need to know the theory behind the practice, so that they can learn to think for themselves and be flexible, not just blindly ‘follow the method’. You can’t get that on a simple four-week TEFL course, which is why I always recommend new Celta-belter teachers to get started on their Dipomas and MAs as soon as possible.
Sandy - noted. But for prospective teachers of other subjects, teacher education is mandatory. Nobody will allow you to teach Math or physics without graduate work as well as teaching practice. EFL is different and very different in Korea. Here, the MATESOL is clearly considered superior to a BA plus Delta since universities here will always take guy no.1 over guy no.2. Having said that, they’d also take someone with an unrelated MA over guy no.2 as well…
It’s marketing. Even a school that knows it means nothing will want to be able to say “Our teachers/ this teacher has an MA”, which is well understood and respected in Korea, especially if it is from a foreign university they have heard of. Few of your prospective students will know or care what a Diploma is- me neither, until I started TEFL. I always thought a Diploma was something like an American 2 year degree, never even heard of a post-graduate diploma.
In summary- you are right, but there’s nothing we can do to change it. If you want the best of everything, take an MA with a built in DELTA, as are now available.
Good luck everybody. I am not in tune with the Celta approach. I don’t think it should have a “Cambridge” badge on it - surely this can only bring Cambridge into disrepute. (We were told before the course that it was not an “academic” approach - so why should Cambridge have any thing to do with it).
I was horrified by the micromanagement imposed by the tutors.
I think it is a course in brainwashing.
A sad thing about CELTA and Trinity certTESOL courses is that very many trainees are accepted on to the courses for purely commercial reasons.
There are a lot of people taken on without adequate levels of basic English. (both NEST and nonNESTs). Though you don’t need a BA to teach English you do need one to get a work permit/visa in many countries. Trainees without degrees ought to be clearly warned about this fact. Trainees need to be mature yet flexible. It’s only a 4 (or sometimes 5) week course and there is a lot to cover. You have to dance to the CELTA tune if you want to get through the course. There really is no time to think for yourself or argue with the trainers. It’s not brainwashing, but it is training, not education.
A lot of the problems on CELTAs stem from ill-informed trainees. Caveat emptor! make sure you know what you’re letting yourself in for. Don’t trust the provider - they are making $$$$ out of you. Seek out the opinions and experiences of those who have been through the mill. Then judge for yourself if it’s worth the money and time (and stress).
A CERT level course is rather like a driving test. It’s an agreed minimum starting standard. You can drive a car without ever having a lesson - many people do. There are people who are dangerous drivers even after passing their tests. But you can’t expect to have a discussion with a driving examiner/instructor about the best way to parallel park. You just have to do as you’re told.
Same thing on a CELTA.
There’s more time for discussion at Diploma level. And Dip candidates are all supposed to be CERT qualified and with 2 years experience in the classroom.
I would like to see CELTAs/certTESOL courses changed substantially. I would prefer trainees to spend more time finding and adapting materials than producing them. I think most TP should be scripted to follow a coursebook. Trainees should start by observing a lesson and then be asked to repeat it (to different students) in their early TP sessions. Then moving on to following a given lesson plan and finally supplementing/adapting a coursebook based lesson.
This is far closer to actual teaching work.
Of course - a CELTA is very unsuitable preparation for 90% of teaching jobs, especially in Korea.