Speaking or not speaking?
As far as I am concerned, there are two different theories for speaking English. One groups of teachers believe that speaking is a really sensitive task which students must do it only with teachers’ surveliance. If students speak by themselves and their teacher do not correct them. They will understand bad English and bad English will be their bad habits and to forget the bad habits are really difficult. Therefore, It is better to talk in front of a teacher who corrects English errors.
Another groups of teacher think differently. They encourage students to speak as much as they can, with error or without errors. The goal of speaking is to communicate with people. Communicating is more important than English mistakes. They want students learn English speaking naturally. They want them to speak English without thinking of English grammars.
I examined the first theory. I did not speak unless I am sure to speak properly, without any errors. While speaking, I was thinking of grammar. I tried but I was slow. When I read about the second theory, I felt better. It gave a good feeling because I at least tried to speak. Trying is better than doing nothing. I spoke even I had grammar mistakes. Making mistakes do not matter, I think making mistakes is part of a learning process. How can I ride a bicycle without riding or learning just by watching a bicycle?
When I know truely about a subject, there is a possibility of making mistakes. I know driving a car but there is always the possibility of an accident. If I know grammar, there is the possibility of making mistakes. I have seen native speakers make many English mistakes, how they want me not to make mistakes while speaking?
I think the first theory is not practical. But, what do you think? Do you think the same or have different idea? which ones are better?
