Discussion Topic: Alternative Energy
The next U.S. president wants to spend 1.5 billion dollars every year for ten years to help develop alternative energies such as wind, solar (energy from the sun) and ethanol (energy from food such as corn or sugar). Some people think this is not realistic. It is too costly and will never provide enough energy for the large economies of today. These people prefer to search for more oil, even if we may harm nature in the process. They also think nuclear energy is more practical. Although nuclear energy is expensive, it can easily provide all the energy we will need in the future.
What do you think? Should we take a chance and try to develop alternative energies, although we may fail in the end? Or should we take the sure choice of pursuing more oil plus nuclear energy? Please write your choice in the comments section and give reasons for your choice. I’m looking forward to a lively discussion!
